Industrialization Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

industrialisation - Essay ExampleThe foundation of all Marxist leads to the analysis of political parties that formed in the earliestish years in the British history. According to Marxists, the foundation of the Major political parties in Britain was based on the economic status of the society by then. The major aim of the political parties was to address the major issues touch on the life of the common population in the society. Politics of one class of people were macrocosm fought by all means and it was all aimed at ensuring equity in the places of extend. There came to the formation of the Marxists in the early years. This brought the major political parties we have today in Britain. These are the Tory company, the Labour Party and the Liberal Party (Daub 2005). The three major parties have not been seen to antagonize with the Marxist thesis rather they conform it. Marx revealed the movement forces of history in order to facilitate the making of history. In the course of t he struggle between the classes, some acquire or lose cohesion and confidence. Thus political parties act as a weapon in the struggle between classes. In his argument Marx argued that there was a rising accent and racket between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. According to Marx, the proletariats were being exploited by the capitalists who were the bourgeoisie. The exploitation being experienced by the proletariat was based on the wealth that was being created and being enjoyed by the bourgeoisie. This major source of the tension being experienced by the two groups was on the economic exploitation where the working had little portion out of what they produced. The materials produced in the factories could be sold at a price higher than the workers wages. This meant that the workers who were mainly the proletariat could work in the factories but could not afford to build the items they produced due to the low wages (Barry 2005). The hostility that Marx set forth was based o n the wealth superiority. The oppressors wanted to acquire all the wealth that was being made by the proletariats. This was the major cause of the tension between the two groups. Riots would arise as the oppressed supportd for the equal treatment of the two groups. There arose a revolution aimed at turn backing the oppressors to digesther with their supporters (Milkovinch 2010). According to Marx, he believed that capitalism was the destructor of the relaxation between the two major groups. He went on to describe in depth how the wealth being enjoyed by the bourgeoisies was a result of the hard work of the proletariat who were the main workers in the factories. In his observation, Marx argued that this antagonism would lead to a revolution that could be aimed at the oppressors who were the bourgeoisies. The rising competition among the two groups makes the commercial crisis get to a bad state. The increased rioting has been attributed to the oppression by the bourgeoisie (Daub 2 005). Marx states that the exploitation of this group of people would lead to intensified resentment causing more hatred. A revolution would arise that would lead to the overthrow of the capitalists and their external supporters. However the situation that Marx described seems to have faded today. This is because there are groups that potently advocate for the equal treatment of all classes of people in the society. There are some who stage their claims and strongly defend the working class calling for meaningful wages. The issue of one group dominating and