Monday, February 18, 2019

Habits That Hinder Thinking :: essays research papers fc

&65279John and Julie, your two best friends, birth just read an article or so the remainder penalty. It explains the reasons why death by lethal injection is a legitimate punishment for trusted crimes.As Julie reads the article, she strongly agrees with what the author has to say. An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, she imagines. Without examining the ideas that argon involved, shessatisfied with everything the article says because, Its completely fair.John, on the some other hand, is deeply offended before hes even sinless reading the article. He leans heavily on the feeling that God has the only power to decide some atomic number 53s fate, non man. Its not right to interfere with another persons existence on Earth, he thinks to himself as he keeps reading.What Julie and John dont manage is that theyve both used some habits that hinder thinking to come up with their opinions. They both had strong initial feelings close to the death penalty. Andthey both terminate wit h those same feelings because they were the most satisfying. But Julie and John failed to try to learn about their opposing opinion. Without even realizing it, they bothbecame victims of thobbing. Henshaw Ward termed thobbing for considering and evaluating ideas. The term combines the th from thinking, the o from opinion, and the b from believing (qtd. in Ruggiero 53). You can be aw atomic number 18 of when you are thobbing by paying close attention to your initial opinions, especially the ones that are very strong.There are many habits that can hinder ones thinking, causing their mind to fall victim to thobbing. Julie and John both used conformity and resistance to change, and rationalizing habitswhen coming up with an opinion about the death penalty article.In The Art of Thinking, Ruggiero states that harmful conformity is what we do instead of thinking in order to belong to a stem or to avoid the risk of being different. Such conformity isan go of cowardice, a sacrifice of ind epedence for a lesser good(49). Julie and John may harbor been conforming when they developed their opinions about the article on the death penalty. They had probably dealt with the argument before and were exposedto other lots opinions. then when they came across this article, they were most satisfied with the belief they were familiar with. They remembered the other peoples attitudes and conformed.John belongs to a church where he practices his belief in Christianity.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.